Superhuman: Find the people who need you most.
An average can hide a group with an urgent need. Explore how segmentation changes the question, then inspect what the numbers cannot prove.
See the idea in one picture ↓- a product-market fit survey
- 1 question
- studied first
- Strong supporters
- founder account
- 2018
Figures as reported by the company.
Independent educational analysis. Scenarios, people, numbers and illustrations on this page are original PMcademy practice material, not company research results or an endorsement.
A launch decision needs more than enthusiasm.
One average hides who needs you
One segment shows where to focus
Read the analysis
Imagine you manage a new reporting tool. Some people rely on it every afternoon, while others tried it once and left. A single satisfaction average gives the team an easy number but a difficult decision. Should you broaden the feature set or deepen the experience for the people who already depend on it? Start by defining what you need to learn, rather than choosing the answer with the largest audience.
A situation is more useful than a flattering persona.
“If this tool disappeared tomorrow, my afternoons would fall apart.”
Read the analysis
Our fictional learner, Leena, coordinates five client updates each day. A missed message can block another person’s work. Compare her situation with someone who prepares one personal report a month. These people may want similar-looking screens for very different reasons. A segment becomes useful when it explains a recurring need, constraint, or benefit. Calling someone a power user only restates the activity you observed.
From one average to one segment
- 1Ask one question
Everyone answers how they would feel if the product went away.
- 2Sort the answers
Group people by answer instead of reading a single blended score.
- 3Study one group
Learn who the very disappointed are and the main benefit they name.
Animated illustration. Names, numbers and people are fictional teaching material.
Change the group. Keep the denominator.
Illustrative data and simplified behaviour. This model does not represent a live company system or measured company results.
Read the analysis
Use the model below to inspect three fictional survey groups. Notice that a higher support percentage can come from a smaller selected group. That can be a promising lead, but selecting the best-performing group after seeing the data creates a hypothesis to validate. It does not turn a small survey into proof of a broad market. Keep eligibility, response counts and nonresponse beside every percentage.
Focus creates both clarity and exclusions.
- A clear first audience
- Sharper onboarding
- Faster learning loops
- Other needs wait
- A smaller market at first
- Risk of over-fitting one group
Read the analysis
Suppose daily coordinators consistently value reliable handoffs. You might prioritise that workflow, explain it more clearly in onboarding, and recruit more people in the same situation. That choice also postpones other needs. Write down who benefits, who waits, and what would justify expanding later. Avoid assuming that every complaint from a less-engaged group is irrelevant; accessibility and safety problems can cross segment boundaries.
Look for the behaviour behind the survey.
The founder describes a survey, a strong-supporter segment and focus on their main benefit.
That the method works for every business or that one threshold proves fit.
- Answers by segment, not overall
- Retention of the focus segment
- Benefit named in their own words
Read the analysis
For your project, combine the survey lead with an observed task and a meaningful return event. Ask which benefit people would miss and what alternative they would use. Check whether the promising group remains promising in a fresh sample. Keep acquisition channel and tenure visible. If the story depends on excluding inconvenient responses without a principled eligibility rule, revisit the claim before presenting it to the team.
Which uncertainty deserves the next week?
Your fictional team can either add three features requested by occasional users or investigate the daily coordinators’ handoff problem. Neither option is universally correct. Choose the next action that most reduces uncertainty about a valuable, reachable need. Explain the cost of being wrong, the evidence you already have, and the smallest observation that could reverse your choice.
Choose a next move
Leave with a segment hypothesis.
Your artifact
Write a segment hypothesis and a two-week evidence plan. Include one result that would make you abandon the focus.
Critique my project artifact using only the evidence I provide. Write a segment hypothesis and a two-week evidence plan. Include one result that would make you abandon the focus. Separate observed facts, assumptions, proposed tests and missing evidence. Identify a failure mode and a cheap check. Do not invent company results or user research. Ask for my artifact before starting.
Read the analysis
Create a one-page segment brief: situation, repeated need, current workaround, main benefit, source evidence, and missing evidence. Add one comparison group and a fresh-sample validation plan. Keep survey counts separate from forecasts. Your deliverable is a focused research decision, not a declaration that you have found product-market fit.